White Police Officer Fired For 5 ‘Racist’ Words He Said About Muslim Terrorists


A white police officer who had been on the force for 3 years was shocked when he was called into the chief’s office for a misconduct hearing. However, as soon as his superiors deemed that the officer had insulted terrorists with 5 “racist” words, they immediately fired him without a second thought.

White Police Officer Fired For 5 'Racist' Words He Said About Muslims Terrorists
Chief Constable Jerry Graham (right) caved to Sharia law and fired officer Ross Lister after he posted 5 words insulting Muslim terrorists. (Photo Credit: MUNIR UZ ZAMAN/AFP/GettyImages, Cumbria Constabulary)

In an effort to force diversity, businesses and government bodies have not only resorted to offering positions to unqualified minorities but ousting the white majority from much-needed occupations. While these privileged minorities are comfortable openly criticizing and inciting racial hatred of whites and Christians, a reversal results in harsh and biased punishments. In fact, Muslims now feel secure in voicing their once-concealed violent and racist verses of the Quran while non-Muslims must walk on eggshells when even referring to Islamic terrorists who slaughter innocent civilians.

Despite faithfully serving as a PC in Barrow in Furnace, Cumbria, for 3 years, officer Ross Lister was fired not for expressing bigotry against a race of people but literally offending murderous jihadists. On September 27, Lister was informed at a misconduct hearing at the UK’s Cumbria Constabulary headquarters that he was terminated from his career because of his “racist” comment on Facebook concerning consequences for Muslim terrorists, to which he simply replied, “What? Wrap them in bacon?”

Local online newspaper The Mail reports that Chief Constable Jerry Graham chose to fire Lister because the Crown Prosecution Service decided not to criminally charge the officer with incitement of racial hatred, despite Lister never once referring to race. Graham ruthlessly hoped to make an example of Lister, reminding individuals that Islam is a protected religion that is illegal to mock in a decision that emulates oppressive Sharia law.

“The conduct admitted by PC Lister today is not suggesting that he is racist, per se, but refers to a Facebook post that he wrote that he either knew or should have known, or at least reasonably have foreseen, would have caused offence and be considered derogatory to members of the Muslim faith and by people of other faiths and none,” Graham stated. “By posting such a comment on Facebook he should have known that he could not control its readership.”

Although Graham won’t outright call Lister “racist,” he infers that his words insulting the Islamic faith certainly are. Additionally, Graham disturbingly alleges that insulting terrorists who are Muslim is an insult to Islam itself, admitting that Islam and terrorism, or at least its terrorist members, are connected.

Graham claims that Lister violated the Code of Ethics yet cannot explain exactly how insulting murderous terrorists falls into this category. However, Graham seems to take it upon himself to speak for the Muslim community, possibly from past experience, to say that Muslims would take offense to non-Muslims denouncing their most devout and violent members.

“Although this conduct occurred off duty, PC Lister was, or should have been, aware that the Code of Ethics applies at all times and in all circumstances to police officers,” Graham added. “I note that within the bundle PC Lister has been given an input on the Code of Ethics as recently as 2017. The communities of Cumbria expect officers and staff to act on their behalf with integrity, fairness and judgement. The trust of local communities, particularly minority groups, is hard won and easily lost.”

Graham is either suggesting that police officers need to gain the “trust” of terrorists or that they shouldn’t insult terrorists because it thwarts them from gaining the trust of the Muslim community. The absurdity of his decision is evident in his reasoning. If arresting or neutralizing terrorists also offends the Muslim community, which it often does, will police officers be required to let them go or refrain from stopping terror attacks?

“Regrettably, PC Lister has exhibited a very serious failure of judgement by posting such a comment without considering the potential impact on how people may perceive him and his judgement and fairness,” Graham concluded. “In doing so he has damaged the reputation of the constabulary and undermined public confidence. PC Lister’s behaviour and judgement has fallen so far below the standards expected that I have decided to dismiss him from the constabulary without notice.”

Even though Muslims and migrants commit a disproportionate amount of crime, Graham is more concerned with not offending them. Furthermore, Graham is willing to terminate good officers for even offending the terrorists they are supposed to be thwarting.

Disturbingly, the thought police are now cracking down on their own officers. Although it was once considered a requirement to combat terrorism, it’s now a dischargeable offense to insult them. Still, while non-Muslims are prohibited from mocking Islam in any way, Muslims are allowed to invoke these explicit commands in the Quran.

Quran (2:191) – “And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing.”

Quran (5:33) – “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement.”

Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.”

Quran (9:5) – “So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them.”

So, when non-Muslims talk about defiling terrorists with bacon, it’s a crime, but when Muslims encourage beheading, crucifying, and all-out war, it’s acceptable simply because it’s categorized as a religion. It is this backward mentality that not only prevents legitimate debate about Islam but empowers violent and oppressive Muslims to exert their will on the non-Muslim majority.

Either Graham and his politically correct compatriots must continue pretending terrorism has no connection to Islam and, therefore, allow non-Muslims to criticize terrorists or he must admit that Islam and terrorism are fundamentally connected and that he’ll enforce Sharia law accordingly.

Please share the story and tell us what you think by clicking one of the buttons below. We want to hear YOUR voice!

Source link